Innovation & R&D

I test whether a technical idea survives contact with physics, prior art and cost. The work is for founders and R&D leads holding a claim nobody has tried to falsify. Afterwards the claim has either a filing date or a written record of why it failed.

The output is a filing date or a falsified claim, with the experiment that decided it written down either way.

I start by writing the central claim as a test that could fail, then search the prior art before any bench time is spent. From you I need the idea, any data behind it and the budget for the first experiment. Each experiment is sized to cost less than the decision it informs, so a dead end is found cheaply.

The work stops at the patent drafting table or the kill memo. I hand over the search record, the test data and the filing strategy; I do not act as a patent attorney. Prosecution, formal freedom-to-operate opinions and regulated clinical work go to specialists I name before the engagement starts.

TYPICAL ENGAGEMENT
4 to 10 weeks, part-time.
WHAT YOU GET
Prior-art search, test record, filing strategy
WHEN TO CALL ME
A technical claim is about to be funded untested.
WHAT THIS IS NOT
Not patent prosecution or a formal freedom-to-operate opinion.
01

What this capability covers

Scattered pencil sketches on torn paper, one sheet in blue

01

Concept generation

Generating candidate mechanisms against a stated constraint, then ranking them by what each would cost to falsify. The output is a shortlist of three, each with its first test.

A blue beam under load in a test rig with a dial gauge and sensor wires

02

Technical feasibility

First-principles modelling and bench tests aimed at the claim most likely to fail. The output is a pass or a fail against a threshold set before testing began.

A machined part resting on blue-line patent drawings of itself

03

Patent & IP

Prior-art search, a claim-drafting brief and the filing order across patents and design registrations. The output is a filing strategy with dates, jurisdictions and costs.

A metal tray of test wells with tweezers, one sample in blue

04

Rapid experimentation

Small, cheap experiments run in sequence, each designed to kill the idea rather than confirm it. The output is a record of what was falsified and why.

A sensor module with a blue band bolted to a worn industrial motor

05

Emerging tech integration

Assessing whether a new material, sensor or process is ready for the product or only for the paper. The output is a readiness call with the evidence behind it.

Research papers fanned in an arc, blue threads linking them to one document

06

Frontier research synthesis

Reading the recent literature so the team does not rebuild a result someone has already published. The output is a cited brief sorted by what each finding changes.

NEXT STEP

The first conversation names the experiment that could kill the idea.

It runs forty-five minutes, costs nothing, and ends with the prior art I would search first and the test I would run.

Expand with Dalfeoo

Contact Us